New FAQs - disappointed

Discuss anything related to the Asrai, our forests, or camps around the Old World in here.

Moderator: Council of Elders

Locked
wisetiger7
Newcomer
Newcomer
Posts: 29
Joined: 01 Mar 2013, 17:14

New FAQs - disappointed

Post by wisetiger7 »

I can't believe this isn't up on here yet.

http://www.blacklibrary.com/faqs-and-errata.html

Tl;dr- Up to 50% Lords and up to 50% Heroes. Every Wizard can choose spells from the Lore of Undeath.

That's it.
Coldpsyker
Newcomer
Newcomer
Posts: 66
Joined: 01 Feb 2014, 04:32

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by Coldpsyker »

Guess all the naysayers finally have their answers.
User avatar
Time of Madness
Newcomer
Newcomer
Posts: 50
Joined: 02 Sep 2005, 00:44

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by Time of Madness »

Nice of them to put up a wood elf faq and answer one question which has never even come up.
"The lions sing and the hills take flight.
The moon by day, and the sun by night.
Blind woman, deaf man, jackdaw fool.
Let the Lord of Chaos rule."
- Robert Jordan
Nymraif
Newcomer
Newcomer
Posts: 59
Joined: 14 Feb 2008, 22:40
Armies I play: Dark Angels, Wood Elves
Location: Earth. Washington

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by Nymraif »

I'm just returning from a long absence. I was off the understanding that our book was awesome. We're there issues that required an FAQ?
Good Hunting. And check the tree line.... we are watching you
nXken
Bladesinger
Bladesinger
Posts: 509
Joined: 02 Oct 2014, 07:47
Armies I play: WE

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by nXken »

Useful shizzle, right there :)
(\__/)
(O.o )
(> < )

This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination.
Coyle_Ravane
Wild Hunter
Wild Hunter
Posts: 1269
Joined: 04 May 2007, 09:39
Armies I play: Wood Elves, Tau, Imperial guard (Tau auxilleries)
Location: Maidstone, Kent, England

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by Coyle_Ravane »

Really GW, you actually made an faq document and posted it on your website for THAT?
Minty wrote:...if you've been killed by a Wood Elf it's nothing personal, but Charles Darwin is smiling with approval.
Image
johho
Newcomer
Newcomer
Posts: 46
Joined: 27 Apr 2014, 11:07

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by johho »

This was funny. A answer to a question that has never been asked.

No answer to the questions that has been asked. For example the frenzy on wild riders and there mount.
User avatar
Furyou Miko
Newcomer
Newcomer
Posts: 96
Joined: 19 Jul 2011, 21:44

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by Furyou Miko »

Nymraif wrote:I'm just returning from a long absence. I was off the understanding that our book was awesome. We're there issues that required an FAQ?
If Magic Arrows are enchanted items, does that mean you can only have one unit or character with Hagsbanes?
User avatar
The_Wendol
Newcomer
Newcomer
Posts: 48
Joined: 09 Oct 2014, 09:39

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by The_Wendol »

THANK KURNOUS THATS CLEARED UP!

(Disappointed definitely says it all)
"Beware the leader of their warriors, he wears the horns of POWER!"
User avatar
GeoffDiGeoff
Trusted Bowman
Trusted Bowman
Posts: 121
Joined: 22 Jul 2014, 13:49
Armies I play: Wood Elves, Dark Elves
Location: Surrey

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by GeoffDiGeoff »

Does this win an award for least useful FAQ's ever?! Sheesh, maybe they're saving them all up for the "End Times: Elvenkind Unite!" book... or not :)
User avatar
hutobega
Wild Hunter
Wild Hunter
Posts: 1097
Joined: 23 May 2010, 01:33
Armies I play: Orcs and goblins, Vampire Counts, Wood Elves.
Location: Cromwell,Connecticut

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by hutobega »

oy vey this doesn't help us at all... most of us ironed out the rules I think anyways and most players except them for what we think they are. Games workshop always has a way of trying to write something plainly and people find ways to manipulate or interpret.

Wild rider mounts have frenzy
And we can have as many arrow types or one types in many units if we want. at least 90% of the player base has accepted that and even in tournaments as well.
How do we prove we exist? Maybe we don't...
User avatar
aFaun
Newcomer
Newcomer
Posts: 7
Joined: 08 Apr 2014, 07:56

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by aFaun »

hutobega wrote: Wild rider mounts have frenzy
And we can have as many arrow types or one types in many units if we want. at least 90% of the player base has accepted that and even in tournaments as well.
I completely agree, but they should make these rules clear anyway, just to prevent some unnecessary arguments between players. At the company I work for, we have a team, whose job is to monitor the internet, FB and different forums, and gather information about the problems and questions what our customers might have. And sometimes, to answer those questions directly. I don't have that much experience with GW, but I already know, that it's too much, to ask...

And what do you guys think? Will the 50% lords, 50% heroes thing bring big changes? I think it will, but I can't imagine, how it will affect the way other armies play.

Cheers:
aFaun
Aezeal
Wild Hunter
Wild Hunter
Posts: 1502
Joined: 22 Aug 2014, 13:54

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by Aezeal »

TBH in my last games I haven't found the characters to be the problem... if my tombking opponent had taken another lord instead of his necroknights I'd have been very glad.
User avatar
Slobber
Horsemaster
Horsemaster
Posts: 329
Joined: 18 Sep 2013, 06:27
Location: Washington Dc

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by Slobber »

It really depends on the army, TK, empire, dwarves, WE, maybe even OnG I don't see it being usefull to exceed 25% on lords and heros. It will change for VC, WoC, and perhaps OK, but with the limited number of magical items I don't think it will change too much. The only super abusive build I could think of off hand would be a Lance of lords and paladins six diceing savage beast. I don't think this is as bad as everyone thinks at first. Granted I don't want to play vs a 6 scream VC list but I'm sure I'll find a way.
war without fire is as worthless as sausages without mustard
NonnoSte
Bladesinger
Bladesinger
Posts: 904
Joined: 07 Oct 2013, 14:59
Armies I play: All kind of Elves.
Location: Turin, Italy.

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by NonnoSte »

Well, WoC can do nasty things too.
No more need to choose between L4 and Chaos Lord looks bad.
Double Star Dragon will be hard to face too.
Coyle_Ravane
Wild Hunter
Wild Hunter
Posts: 1269
Joined: 04 May 2007, 09:39
Armies I play: Wood Elves, Tau, Imperial guard (Tau auxilleries)
Location: Maidstone, Kent, England

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by Coyle_Ravane »

If it helps, we could potentially field 4 L2 Treeman Ancients, and 2 regular Treemen. + minimum core.
Minty wrote:...if you've been killed by a Wood Elf it's nothing personal, but Charles Darwin is smiling with approval.
Image
Phil Rossiter
Wild Hunter
Wild Hunter
Posts: 1549
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 13:02
Location: Britain

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by Phil Rossiter »

Daemons might not be a lot of fun.

:eek:
User avatar
godswearhats
Elder of the Council
Posts: 1961
Joined: 19 Oct 2012, 18:20
Armies I play: Wood Elves
Location: Wexford, IE
Contact:

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by godswearhats »

To be fair, I did send this to GW and got a reply.
It appears as if there's a typo in the Wood Elves army book (including the digital edition). In the section describing the Lore of Dark Magic, the spell Shroud of Despair says:

“Until the start of the caster’s next Magic phase, the targets cannot benefit from the Hold the Line or Inspiring Presence rules.”

According to the Dark Elves book, it should say "Hold Your Ground" not "Hold the Line". Given that there is also a special rule called Hold the Line (for Empire troops), this has caused some bickering amongst more pedantic players.

Hope this helps,
Aidan
Hi Aidan,

Thank you for your email. I have now passed this on to our rules team who will get this rectified as soon as possible.

Many thanks,

Stuart

Black Library Customer Services
Rank and Flank: A Warhammer: The Old World Podcast and Discord
Aezeal
Wild Hunter
Wild Hunter
Posts: 1502
Joined: 22 Aug 2014, 13:54

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by Aezeal »

Hmm they seem to have missed there are other questions too, can you mail them about those too?
User avatar
Polycotton
Newcomer
Newcomer
Posts: 76
Joined: 05 May 2014, 06:29

Re: New FAQs - disappointed

Post by Polycotton »

The new character changes are really pleasing. With my Undead army I was always forced into the same character choices. Now I can just pimp my Vampire Lord out a bit more with magic and save a bunch of points on characters and get more troops. My mate who has Ogres will be able to get a Hero Level BSB and Level 2 Mage.
Locked